Greening Spaces

Litteratuering on the sustainable design of space: architecture, urban planning, construction, interior design and alternative residential lifestyles

Cow dung for electricity, green homes win $1.5 million


Grameen Shakti — the word comes from a Sanskrit root meaning energy, force or empowerment — has enabled as many as 2 million people in Bangladesh to light their homes using solar power. It has helped thousands more use chicken or cow dung either to make electricity or as a fuel in cook stoves that are efficient, safe and clean. The Bangladeshi non-profit’s managing director Dipal Barua just made his company a lot greener with a $1.5 million prize. Read more.

Filed under: development, energy, green, housing, sustainability

Some of it sounds right: Now let’s implement it

Embedded video from CNN Video

“We will build the roads and bridges, the electric grids and digital lines that feed our commerce and bind us together.”
“We will harness the sun and winds and the soil to fuel our cars and run our factories.”

“All this we can do. All this we will do.
“There are some who question the scale of our ambitions, who suggest that our system cannot tolerate too many big plans. Their memories are short. For they have forgotten what this country has already done, what free men and women can achieve when imagination has joined a common purpose.”
“The nation cannot prosper long when it favors only the prosperous.”
“…Know that your people will judge you based on what you can build; not on what you can destroy.”

Filed under: community, green, housing, Obama, sustainability, technology, transportation

Solomon speaks: the WPA and New Urbanism

“The idea that is emerging from many sources in different forms is to retool America – its cities, its industry, its infrastructure and its landscape – to flourish in the post-oil economy of the mid-21st century. The post-oil economy will be as profound for the 21st century as the railroad was for the 19th, or the automobile was for the 20th, and it will be carried with a force of inevitability greater than either.”
So wrote Dan Solomon, co-founder of the Congress for the New Urbanism in the San Francisco Chronicle on Thursday (as brought to my attention by Filmanowicz’s twittering/blog).
“Now American housing faces new challenges. Most Americans cannot afford housing in the great urban centers that are served by public transportation and should be the locus of economic activity. There are no policy tools to address the growing disparity between the costs of producing housing, particularly housing that does not depend upon automobiles, and what middle class people can afford.”
Read his piece in the SFChronicle.

Filed under: architecture, community, construction, housing, Obama, real estate, transportation, urbanization

Solomon speaks: the WPA and New Urbanism

“The idea that is emerging from many sources in different forms is to retool America – its cities, its industry, its infrastructure and its landscape – to flourish in the post-oil economy of the mid-21st century. The post-oil economy will be as profound for the 21st century as the railroad was for the 19th, or the automobile was for the 20th, and it will be carried with a force of inevitability greater than either.”
So wrote Dan Solomon, co-founder of the Congress for the New Urbanism in the San Francisco Chronicle on Thursday (as brought to my attention by Filmanowicz’s twittering/blog).
“Now American housing faces new challenges. Most Americans cannot afford housing in the great urban centers that are served by public transportation and should be the locus of economic activity. There are no policy tools to address the growing disparity between the costs of producing housing, particularly housing that does not depend upon automobiles, and what middle class people can afford.”
Read his piece in the SFChronicle.

Filed under: 1429145, architecture, community, construction, housing, real estate, transportation, urbanization

Coletta Interview Part 2: Smart cities and where we’re going


Richard Florida and Carol Coletta. Photo credit

I’ve been listening to Carol Coletta’s Smart City, a weekly public radio program, for more than a year. So full of information it is, that I archive each episode. Among other things we discussed during Friday’s interview was Obama’s infrastructure plans and the likelihood they’ll be akin to a WPA program. Her show the week of our interview just happened to be on that same subject.

But first, let’s start with what makes Carol Coletta an international name in urban planning. Coletta served as president of Coletta & Company, a Memphis-based consultancy that creates strategic community investment plans for major corporations. She’s served as executive director of the Mayors’ Institute on City Design, a partnership of the National Endowment for the Arts, U.S. Conference of Mayors and American Architectural Foundation. Carol was a Knight Fellow in Community Building for 2003 at the University of Miami School of Architecture and is currently a candidate for a Master of Design Methods at the Institute of Design at IIT. She is frequently interviewed as an expert on urban issues by national media and is an active speaker on the success formula for cities and creative communities.

What are three characteristics smart cities share?
“They have a lot of talent. That is, human capital. They know how to attract it, keep it, and develop it. They have dense connections between people and resources and money. They also understand and act on their distinctiveness. They have strong vital cores.”

And what are some examples?
“Chicago; Portland, Oregon; Austin, Texas; San Francisco; Seattle and Boston.”

Obama talks a lot about a major infrastructure initiative, which might employ some 3 million people. What will that entail? Will it proliferate car-centered development or encourage public transportation or perambulation? Will it lead to some sort of WPA programming?
“If the states drive the list of projects– the shovel-ready projects– it will be business as usual. These are new roads, new bridges. We don’t need new capacity; we need to think beyond the system we’ve built for the last 50 years and say, ‘Is that really 21st-century infrastructure?’ (For Obama) the idea is to put people back to work. If the governors drive this, it’s not going to be pretty. Read Richard Gilbert and Anthony Perl’s Transport Revolutions. They pointed out that electricity is a carrier, it’s not an output. You can create it with water, coal, nuclear, bio fuels… in many ways. We could retrofit autos and buses, etc. to use those alternative electricity sources. I think a WPA program would be terrific, but even that takes time to gear up, like the sustainable infrastructure plans.
Smart Growth America (A nationwide coalition promoting a better way to grow; one that protects farmland and open space, revitalizes neighborhoods, keeps housing affordable, and more) has provided good ideas for how to find the right workers and projects…. What you could do to put people to work really fast is to retrofit schools and government buildings. We could also retrofit residential buildings with funding from projected utility/energy savings. The Clinton Initiative (for example) worked to retrofit office buildings.”

How will the recent real estate boom and its resulting economic woes help shape land planning and urban design?
“The notion that you can take any piece of land in America and build whatever the heck you want to on it is over. You can see it in increased transit use. People have more incentive to live closer in. Other means of transport won’t be seen as a sacrifice but as a preference. People will rediscover the joys of real community and look for public transportation options, living more conveniently. The age of megamansions is dead. People will stop wanting to have so much space and so much storage and so much materialism. They say, ‘Do I want a backyard or Millennium Park two blocks from my house? Millennium Park, thank you!’”

The following books and URLS served as props for the interview and/or were recommended by Coletta.
Richard Gilbert and Anthony Perl’s Transport Revolutions
SmartGrowthAmerica
Richard Florida’s Who’s Your City?
Duany, Plater-Zyberk, Speck’s Suburban Nation: the Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream

See part one.

Filed under: books, community, green, housing, real estate, urbanization

Doyenne of Smart Cities: An Interview with Carol Coletta

Carol Coletta is president/CEO of CEOs for Cities and host/producer of the nationally syndicated public radio show Smart City.

Radiohead’s early music plays a little too loudly at the Intelligentsia on Randolph, within walking distance of Millennium Park and the Chicago Cultural Center, so I edge my pseudo-aluminum chair to hear what Carol Coletta’s saying. With her blonde, stylishly disheveled coif and subtle makeup seemingly perfect, you’d never guess she’d awoken at 430 a.m. in Memphis to catch her plane to Chicago. Having homes in both places, she’s a frequent traveler, and in her gently Memphis dialect she also discusses her trips to Australia, South Africa, and China.
The conversation was extensive, though certainly I would have loved to talk to her all day. I didn’t get to ask her about the likelihood of cohousing and cooperative communities making it into the mainstream as an indirect result of this tired economy. I didn’t get to Rorschach quiz her on homeowners associations. Nor was I able to ask about her initial thoughts on NIMBYism. And while I didn’t get to ask her about what books or resources she’d recommend for space design aficionados or experts– she did slip some into our easily flowing and jam-packed conversation; you can find them in part two of the interview, coming tomorrow.

Do you lean toward Thomas Friedman’s theory that information technology erases distance and therefore enhances anyone’s creativity and productivity tools anywhere, or toward Richard Florida, who says there’s something uniquely, intellectually, creatively inspiring about metropolitan areas?
“Tom Friedman is correct in that tech makes us more productive and lets us work from anywhere. Richard Florida is right because the chance meetings that cities enable makes us more productive. Bill Bishop has done wonderful work in that same area, making the same point of (Florida): the more educated you are, the more mobile you are. People from 25 to 34 years old are more mobile.”
–From 1990 to 2000 these people went to 16 of the top 50 metropolitan areas of the U.S. That means the other 34 major cities lost those people.

How do we know New Urbanism isn’t just another Radiant City or City Beautiful?
“New Urbanism has been phenomenal in terms of its packaging and marketing. They have succeeded in building much better suburbs and have been good advocates for better roadways, smaller roadways. Doug Farr wrote a book called Sustainable Urbanism: Urban Design with Nature, which is a brilliant piece of work. He’s on the board of the Congress for New Urbanism. LEED ND is trying to promote a different sort of planning. The two are very compatible in a lot of ways, certainly not incompatible. New Urbanism is better than traditional suburbs, what without their sense of place and location away from core area of cities.”

When asked how New Urbanism has helped or hindered the redevelopment of New orleans, Coletta pointed out Brad Pitt’s underwriting a design competition.

.msnbcLinks {font-size:11px; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #999; margin-top: 5px; background: transparent; text-align: center; width: 425px;} .msnbcLinks a {text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px;} .msnbcLinks a:link, .msnbcLinks a:visited {color: #5799db !important;} .msnbcLinks a:hover, .msnbcLinks a:active {color:#CC0000 !important;}

“New Orleans is just as vulnerable to flooding again and the development hasn’t taken that into consideration. The great miscalculation is that everyone would come back, but they haven’t. It’s become a shrinking city like Cleveland, Detroit, Youngstown and Buffalo.”

In tomorrow’s post I’ll discuss shrinking cities, Obama’s infrastructural plans, the economy’s long-term effects on land planning, and more.

Filed under: architecture, community, construction, green, housing, Jane Jacobs, real estate, urbanization

What would Carol Coletta do?


Later this week I’m meeting Carol Coletta, host of the weekly public radio talk show Smart City, which I’ve glowingly referenced on this blog. Of course I’ve prepared numerous questions– she’s a guru to me!–, but I’d like some input from my readers.
What would you ask Carol if you had an hour to chat over tea with the Doyenne of Urbanism?
Email me at Spacedesign232@gmail.com by Thursday night.

Filed under: community, housing, urbanization

Obama names New HUD Secretary

President-elect Barack Obama named Shaun Donovan as secretary of Housing and Urban Development today. Donovan, an architect by training, is the current New York City housing commissioner.
Obama wants to use the second half of a $700 billion financial industry rescue plan to help stem foreclosures, the Associated Press reports. Congress this year also put in place a $300 billion program designed to let troubled homeowners swap risky loans for more affordable ones, though few have applied.

Filed under: housing, real estate

Chicago’s Find Your Place Program: Enriching the city’s diversity in a time of need

Photo Destination360.com

He is an up-and-coming architect. Been on the job nine or ten years and has already earned a big career jump. Now he wants to buy a house in the West Loop, but he’s afraid of the credit crunch and his income’s nowhere near six figures. What does he do? He contacts Find Your Place in Chicago.
She is a single mother of three, a grade school teacher on Chicago’s South Side and often has to skip at least one monthly bill to survive. She wants a better residential neighborhood for her children, watching the low-income neighborhood’s influences on them. Is she stuck? How can she move up? She can contact Find Your Place in Chicago.
These anecdotes are composite examples of the wide variety of people who benefit from FYPC. FYPC is affiliated with the City of Chicago’s Partnership for New Communities, a consortium of programs borne to prevent slums and provide public housing alternatives. Mayor Richard Daley announced the FYPC program in September, when the housing market was already in shambles, and just before the economy took a nosedive. Later that month, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary Steven Preston bequeathed Chicago $55 million to help improve mixed-income public housing and to ease the blow of the national mortgage crisis. The funds will be used to buy and redevelop abandoned properties hit by the mortgage crisis. One million dollars of that will go to FYPC.
With those clams, the program will stimulate the housing market multi-fold, generating sales for developers whose work has all but stopped, help homeowners keep their homes, and empower prospective homebuyers such as the architect and the teacher. Therefore it benefits the city overall. It’s one way of dealing with the credit crunch, and a better alternative than putting up Radiant Garden City Beautiful projects.
Urban planning activist Jane Jacobs coined the phrase in her book, The Death and Life of Great American Cities. It essentially combines the Utopian yet improperly functioning urban planning systems such as the Radiant City devised by Swiss architect/planner Le Corbusier, English journalist Ebenezer Howard’s Garden City, and Chicago’s own Daniel Burnham, the leader in the City Beautiful movement.
“Orthodox planning is much imbued with puritanical and Utopian conceptions of how people should spend their free time, and in planning, these moralisms on people’s private lives are deeply confused with concepts about the workings of cities,” she wrote. “There is … room in cities for … differences and … in taste, purpose and interest of occupation.” A city is, after all complex order.
Instead, the FYPC program is not a prescriptivist response to how the city should handle the fallout of the housing market; it is an organic response that allows its denizens to make choices. It enhances the city’s socioeconomic diversity and its residents’ differences in taste. Furthermore, it paves a more responsible avenue toward the American Dream.
Imagine your own neighborhood without stopgap measures like this. The octogenarian down your street loses her house, followed by your neighbor who lost his job and his house, followed by the newlywed couple up the street, then more and more homes in your neighborhood are abandoned, left vacant. Your new neighbors are vagrants. Property values plummet. Vandalism, graffiti and crime become as common as watching families play in their front yards.
Enter the FYPC program.
“All of us in city government work hard to make sure Chicago is the kind of city where
people want to live, work and raise a family. That means investing in the kinds of things that help create opportunity– education, workforce development, critical infrastructure and the environment,” Daley said when announcing the program. “And, of course, it means investing in housing, which has been a key part of our strategy to improve the quality of life for all residents of Chicago.”
FYPC’s more than 200 residences, priced from $150,000 to $450,000, include condos, single-family homes, two-flats and townhomes in 22 neighborhoods. Some are new construction projects that almost fell by the way side when the real estate bubble burst; others are rehabs with contemporary finishes. The city’s developer partners, lenders, and philanthropic organizations supplement the federal monies to offer significant incentives. These incentives range from include federal tax credit, money for down payment and closing costs, free upgrades, and financial assistance from area employers.
This is not gentrification. This is not a new form of public housing communities, hence the Radiant Garden City Beautiful. It’s enriching communities throughout the city. For example, consider the Century Tower in the Loop. For less than $135,000, FYPC participants can select a studio condo there– a historic Art Deco highrise within walking distance of the House of Blues, the Merchandise Mart, the Chicago River and ample public transportation. Century Tower’s developer, American Invsco, offers a number of incentives: down payment and/or closing-cost assistance, federal tax credits, or 3%, 30-year fixed-rate mortgages.

The web site exemplifies how its TaxSmart incentive program works.
INCOME LIMITS
Non-Target Area Target Area
1 Person Household $60,320 $72,384
2 Person Household $75,400 $90,480
3+ Person Household $86,710 $105,560

What would Jane Jacobs say about the City of Chicago’s FYPC program?

Filed under: community, housing, Jane Jacobs, urbanization

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.